More Research About Low-Protein Diets and Chronic Kidney Disease

I spoke to my doctor about a low protein diet. She mentioned the Modification of diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study which she claimed was a large study that excluded diabetic CKD patients and, therefore, had a lot of PKD patients. She said it proved there was no proof that such a diet would slow the progression of PKD. I am looking into it further. It seems she is more concerned (as are other nephrologists) with patients being malnourished prior to dialysis or transplant. She was more adamant about me eating more protein than I have been than she has been about anything else we've discussed. I am eating around 35-40 grams of protein per day. A pretty normal amount. I was shooting for 30, but making about 35 most days.

Because of our conversation I am doing more research on the MDRD study specifically. What I've found is not exactly what she indicated, but I've only done preliminary searching. It seems that there is still no consensus about low-protein diets. Some doctors say it does slow progression, others say is doesn't and yet others indicate that the studies are inconclusive -- that there seems to be some evidence for the positive, but not yet enough to be conclusive. Here are a couple of citations and abstracts for articles I found this morning:

D. W. Johnson. Dietary protein restriction as a treatment for slowing chronic kidney disease progression: the case against. Nephrology (Carlton),11:1,p.58-62 Abstrac: Low-protein diets (angiotensin blockade; and (vi) low-protein diets are associated with both statistically and clinically significant declines in nutritional markers in chronic kidney disease populations, which already have a high prevalence of malnutrition. Patients with progressive kidney disease are therefore likely to be better served by avoiding dietary protein restriction (thereby ensuring optimal preservation of their nutrition) and instituting alternative, proven renoprotective measures (e.g. renin-angiotensin system blockade, blood pressure reduction and statin therapy).

A. S. Levey, T. Greene, M. J. Sarnak, et al. Effect of dietary protein restriction on the progression of kidney disease: long-term follow-up of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study. Am.J.Kidney Dis.,48:6,p.879-888 Abstract: BACKGROUND: The long-term effect of a low-protein diet on the progression of chronic kidney disease is unknown. We evaluated effects of protein restriction on kidney failure and all-cause mortality during extended follow-up of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. METHODS: Study A was a randomized controlled trial from 1989 to 1993 of 585 patients with predominantly nondiabetic kidney disease and a moderate decrease in glomerular filtration rate (25 to 55 mL/min/1.73 m(2) [0.42 to 0.92 mL/s/1.73 m(2)]) assigned to a low- versus usual-protein diet (0.58 versus 1.3 g/kg/d). We used registries to ascertain the development of kidney failure (initiation of dialysis therapy or transplantation) or a composite of kidney failure and all-cause mortality through December 31, 2000. We used Cox regression models and intention-to-treat principles to compute hazard ratios for the low- versus usual-protein diet, adjusted for baseline glomerular filtration rate and other factors previously associated with the rate of decrease in glomerular filtration rate. We estimated hazard ratios for the entire follow-up period and then, in time-dependent analyses, separately for 2 consecutive 6-year periods of follow-up. RESULTS: Kidney failure and the composite outcome occurred in 327 (56%) and 380 patients (65%), respectively. After adjustment for baseline factors, hazard ratios were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.12) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.08), respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios for both outcomes were lower during the first 6 years (0.68; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.93 and 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.87, respectively) than afterward (1.27; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.80 and 1.29; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.78; interaction P = 0.008 and 0.002, respectively). Limitations include lack of data for dietary intake and clinical conditions after conclusion of the trial. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of a 2- to 3-year intervention of dietary protein restriction on progression of nondiabetic kidney disease remains inconclusive. Future studies should include a longer duration of intervention and follow-up.

S. Mandayam and W. E. Mitch. Dietary protein restriction benefits patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology (Carlton),11:1,p.53-57 Abstract: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rapidly increasing so every strategy should be used to avoid the complications of CKD. Most CKD symptoms or uraemia are caused by protein intolerance; symptoms arise because the patient is unable to excrete metabolic products of dietary protein and the ions contained in protein-rich foods. Consequently, CKD patients accumulate salt, phosphates, uric acid and many nitrogen-containing metabolic products, and secondary problems of metabolic acidosis, bone disease and insulin resistance become prominent. These problems can be avoided with dietary planning. Protein-restricted diets do not produce malnutrition and with these diets even patients with advanced CKD maintain body weight, serum albumin and normal electrolyte values. Non-compliance is a problem, but this can be detected using standard techniques to provide the patient with appropriate responses. The role of dietary protein restriction in the progression of CKD has not been proven, but it can reduce albuminuria and will prevent uraemic symptoms. Until a means of preventing kidney disease or progression is found, safe methods of management such as dietary manipulation should be available for CKD patients.

C. Meloni, P. Tatangelo, S. Cipriani, et al. Adequate protein dietary restriction in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with chronic renal failure. J.Ren.Nutr.,14:4,p.208-213 Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a dietary protein restriction is useful for slowing the progression of chronic renal failure (CRF) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients and to analyze the possible risk of malnutrition after such a dietary regimen. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized case-control clinical trial. SETTING: Nephrology outpatients. PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 169 patients, 89 affected with CRF and chronic hypertension and 80 affected with overt diabetic nephropathy (24 suffering from type 1 and 56 from type 2 diabetes) and chronic hypertension. INTERVENTION: Diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 40 diabetic patients received a low-protein diet (0.8 g/kg/day) and 40 were maintained on a free protein diet; similarly, 44 nondiabetic patients received a low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg/day) and 45 were maintained on a free protein diet. The investigation lasted 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Renal function and nutritional status. RESULTS: At the end of the study, there were no statistically significant differences in renal function between treated and nontreated diabetic patients, whereas treated nondiabetic patients showed a lower decrease in renal function compared with the nontreated group. In both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, the mean body weight and obesity index decreased significantly in treated patients compared with nontreated ones. Serum albumin and prealbumin were stable in all patients during the whole study time, and there were no other signs of malnutrition. CONCLUSION: An adequate dietary protein restriction is accepted by patients, and it is well tolerated during a 12-month follow-up. Without any sign of malnutrition, it is possible to get near the ideal body weight and to reduce the obesity index and the body mass index, which are both well-established risk factors for developing cardiovascular pathology. In nondiabetic patients only, we observed a significant slowing of the progression of renal damage.